On HASRA v. PAWS:
The split was PAWS 25% and HASRA 75%. PAWS to use their portion on spay and neuter, HASRA to use the money to benefit the animals
PAWS alleges that HASRA wanted to use the money for their own shelter, but the fact is the event took place in December, long before Debbie was banned.
It wasn't until January 10th that they banned her, and not until February that it was decided to try and raise money for a "sanctuary".
The words from PAWS reps was that "they were not sure HASRA would use the money to benefit the animals considering the ban of Debbie.
HASRA is an open book, we hide nothing.
PAWS alleges that HASRA wanted to use the money for their own shelter, but the fact is the event took place in December, long before Debbie was banned.
It wasn't until January 10th that they banned her, and not until February that it was decided to try and raise money for a "sanctuary".
The words from PAWS reps was that "they were not sure HASRA would use the money to benefit the animals considering the ban of Debbie.
HASRA is an open book, we hide nothing.
On Hospice Wars:
You may feel if a hospice closes the creditors are the real losers, but what about the employees?
On Evelyn Servin:
You can bet the FBI has a thick file on Mrs. Servin. Watch for her to join her husband soon.
On Political Endorsements:
Do you offer paid endorsements?
*****
We have to comment on the last one. No. We do not offer paid endorsements. We do accept political advertising, but we will never endorse any candidate in order to obtain advertising money. Our friends at Pen N Sword also accept advertising, but not only do they not endorse for money, they make no endorsements at all.
Endorse for money? People actually do that?
Shoalanda